The Truthseeker Blog

 

This is a recent Dear Abby letter regarding an elderly neighbor taking one picture of a mother’s child and niece in their costumes on Halloween night :

---

 DEAR ABBY: Please help me. I wasn’t sure how to handle an uncomfortable situation last Halloween, and your answer will help me be better prepared this year.

I took my 4-year-old daughter and 2-year-old niece trick-or-treating. We only walk up walkways that are well-lit. As we approached one house, an older gentleman was waiting at the open door, handing out candy to the kids.

Before I could process what was happening, he whipped out (whipped out?) a camera and took a picture of my daughter and niece (with you standing right behind them). I was not comfortable with it at all. But what could I have possibly done or said without being rude? Our neighborhood is a safe area, but in this day and age you can trust no one.

Do you think it was inappropriate for an older man to take pictures of someone’s children? What would be the proper way to handle it this year? — HALLOWEEN ESCORT, SAN DIEGO

DEAR ESCORT: While I admire your vigilance as a parent, if the children were wearing cute costumes, I don’t think it was inappropriate for the gentleman to want to take their picture. Of course, it would have been better had this neighbor first asked permission. But since he didn’t, and it made you uncomfortable, avoid his house this year and in the future.

---

    Now this is paranoia. What is wrong with someone taking a picture or two of parents with their children on a well lit and festive night? If this elderly gentleman had anything to hide, he wouldn’t be standing outside his own door with the porch light on where everyone can see him, that’s a sign of trust not deviation. He is probably just being nostalgic for the holiday.This woman should know that over 90% of sexual abuse is not committed by a stranger. It is often a well known family member or friend according to the Department Of Justice. “Stranger danger” is largely a myth. It is shocking to know how many people are uneducated about this subject and it’s time to change that. Keep in mind that there has not been one documented case where a registered sex offender has sexually abused a trick-or-treater. With so many on the registry being low-risk people, it’s no surprise. If a real predator wanted to abduct a child, why would he choose a night when traffic, lights, parents, neighbors and police are prevalent? It makes no sense. The corporate news media and vote-hunting politicians have employed these scare tactics to fatten their wallets, not to make your kids safer.Factually, traffic is more of a threat to your child’s safety than sex offenders are. Think about how easy it would be for your child to dart into a busy street while you talk with a neighbor only to learn your daughter was ran over by an intoxicated driver or careless teenager kissing his girlfriend behind the wheel. It is easy for a tragedy like this to occur, so be sure to keep an eagle eye on where your kids wander this Halloween night (always worked when I took my own daughter out trick-or-treating). But also keep in mind that plenty of former sex offenders have families too and are just as concerned about their safety. So use logic when trying to keep your kids safe on Halloween and look beyond media or political hype if you want legitimate data [this link is a great place to start].

Have a joyful and safe Halloween!

 

Some cult groups are trying to defame people in our civil rights circle by fraudulently associating our screennames with a bizarre group called “Boy Chat”. Personally, I have never even heard of this group / website until a YouTube cyber-stalker brought it up in his ignorant message. Apparently, they are some sort of child exploitation bunch. However, I have heard by some that groups like Boy Chat were created by vigilante cultists for the sole purpose of defaming those who support reforming the registry.

Also, there is word that these cultists snap screenshots of chat conversations and doctor up the image to make it appear someone they despise was involved in an inappropriate chat. This or, the cultist logged in with someone else’s screenname and actually had the conversation his or her self. This deception is very easy to accomplish given the proper software.

Let me state flat out that none of us who support civil rights are in no way associated with groups like Boy Chat or any other sick group. This is simply another scam by cultists who may have created these groups to begin with. We support the reform of bad sex offender laws that unjustly punish men, women, and children who do not belong on public registries, especially since many are non-violent and have families of their own to provide for. We strongly support the prevention of sexual abuse, something these misguided laws do not.

So again, just use common logic when you hear about such ludicrous statements from people who prefer to hide their true identities and who may themselves be responsible for what garbage they try to throw at civil rights activists. It’s quite concerning when  you think about it.

 

Here is a list of websites, pages, and blogs disguised as civil rights organizations (spoof sites) created by online vigilante sects in hopes of discrediting valid groups. If these spoof sites ask for donations, steer clear!

---

• Spoof Site - www.corrupted-justice.net

• Real Site - www.corrupted-justice.com

Advice - Make sure the URL ends with “com”.

---

• Spoof Site - http://www.youtube.com/user/Sex0ffenderIssues

• Real Site - http://www.youtube.com/user/SexOffenderIssues

Advice : replace the number “0″ with the letter “o”.

---

• Spoof Site - http://www.youtube.com/user/SOCLEARMEDlA

• Real Site - http://www.youtube.com/user/soclearmedia

Advice : Replace the number “1″ in “media” with the letter “i”.

---

More fake websites will be listed in this post when available. If you spot more on the Web, please leave a comment.

 

It has come to my attention that YouTube members like AZUStitches77 and AntiPaedo have been trying to defame our cause by posting fraudulent statements in their videos/blogs about former sex offenders.

I have challenged AZUStitches77’s claim that all sex offenders are rapists or one day will be rapists by asking her to provide factual data to support these absurd statements. To date, AZUStitches77 has not provided any factual data. Why? Because she is a fraud bent on destroying lives. Here are some of the myths people like AZUStitches77 are spreading around and what the truth is :

1. Most sex offenders are molesters or rapists and often re-offend. TRUTH : Most former sex offenders have NOT raped or molested anyone and a number are teenagers who had consensual sex with other teenagers. According to the Department Of Justice , less than 8% of sex offenders re-offend and most sexual abuse is committed by someone who is not on a registry which debunks the myth of “stranger danger” in the majority of cases.
2. Children are not on sex offender registries because it is illegal to place them there. TRUTH : There are indeed children as young as 10 (possibly younger) on some registries like the one in Texas. The rules change when it comes to sexual offenses. Many of these children have committed non-violent crimes such as playing doctor.
3.  You can’t be placed on a registry for urinating in public. TRUTH : Oh yes you can. There are a number of people on sex offender registries for “indecent exposure” crimes like urinating in public.
4. Anyone who views dirty pictures on the Net will go on to molest somebody. TRUTH : Nope. There are a variety of reasons why a person would view images deemed as child porn. It may simply be out of research as in the case of Pete Townshend (”The Who”) or to help authorities find the people who produce such materials. Factually, most who only view these images do not go on to hurt anyone. Plus, did you know Mark Lunsford downloaded images to his home computer? See post below.
5. Vigilantes fight for the children! TRUTH : Most vigilantes are cultists who see nothing wrong with violently attacking not only former sex offenders, but also their children. Plus, they care nothing about the teenagers and children included on sex offender registries who committed non-violent crimes simply because they believe all sex offenders are “monsters”. Fighting for the children? I think not.

Here is one of AZUStitches77’s fraudulent videos that claim Z-man (an activist) “incites sex offenders to blow up buildings” -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsB3GICbnsE

Please watch this video and rate it one star while posting critical comments on it’s defaming nature.

Also, check out my own video response here. ←

My video response is also available on YouTube . ←

---

 My textual response to AZU’s smear campaign against me on their Google blog :

  Oh wow, I must have struck a nerve because Absolute Zero United found it necessary to post a photo and semi-accurate data about me (they are even giving out the address of where my parents live, nice). It just proves even more how dangerous this cult is by using my photo to invite a violent attack against me and my family. What a smear campaign! I’ll just give AZU fair warning to remove this defaming post right away because neglecting to do so will be quite a mistake with Google and law enforcement. Once again, your demented cult has broken the law.

Check out Nevada Law regarding cyber stalking/harassment :

NRS 200.575 § 3 Stalking: Definitions and Penalties
A person who commits the crime of stalking with the use of an Internet or network site or electronic mail or any other similar means of communication to publish, display or distribute information in a manner that substantially increases the risk of harm or violence to the victim shall be punished for a category C felony as provided in NRS 193.130

NOTE : Jan Kruska is currently suing AZU and WIKIsposure for defamation of character among other serious charges. The threats she and her children have receieved from AZU is a huge injustice. We support Jan all the way!

So AZU denies there are teenagers on registries for having consensual sex with other teenagers. Well just have a look at RickysLife sometime or read about Jean Ponzanelli who is serving time for consensual teen sex. Not to mention Petra Luna (Barbara Ochoa) admitted this fact, saying that registering teenagers for such activity is a “necessary evil “. There are many “Romeo” teens on sex offender registries and it’s unjust. AZU also claims there is no difference between a person who views a handful of dirty pictures online and a person who violently rapes a child. Hmmm, well that would mean they should feel the same way about Mark Lunsford who viewed such images on his home PC (see post below). Yet, I have never heard them call Mark a “pedophile” or even say he should be punished for this activity. Hmm, I guess AZU believes high-profile people should not serve any time for sexual offenses. That’s interesting.

Again, consider who the real dangerous people in society are. After seeing how they are trying to make my digital photo into an online target board and how they promote violence against teenagers like Ricky, you can decide for yourself who the real creeps are in the world.

---

I ask that you know the truth before you buy in to these ludicrous claims by AZUStitches77 and other rabble-rousing cultists. Education is the key to safety, not hysteria. When you see any videos posted by these people, consider how many families are impacted by their hate-mongering, especially the children which they claim to protect. Also, ask them to provide factual data to back up their claims. I’m sure these warped individuals will come up empty-handed.

 

Recently, KCBD-TV in Lubbock, Texas did a news story on local employment of sex offenders. Apparently these were law-abiding and productive individuals, but the “news” crew set out to destroy the lives these people were trying to put back together via listing their names, photos, and addresses of where they work, promoting vigilantism and resulting in the termination of at least two workers.

Not only does this action by channel 11 impact the lives of former offenders, but also their families (including children). This station neglected to state the facts about sex offenders, like that only a small percentage re-offend and that most are low-risk according to the Department Of Justice. However, KCBD profiled only a few out of the 90+ offenders they looked up, stating that the offenses of these selected few involved “rape”. According to new definitions, a rape can be regarded as anything between two teenagers having consensual sex to someone forcing sex on a victim at gunpoint! I think KCBD’s description of their crimes are likely inflated based on this finding, plus what about the others, are they all rapists? Likely not because factually, the majority of registered sex offenders have never committed rape.

Click here to watch SOClear Media’s response to KCBD-TV’s news story . Why didn’t KCBD report the facts? Keep in mind this is a FOX station and that FOX is well-known for biased and fraudulent reporting.

Truthfully, this is nothing more than a witch hunt that was crafted to boost ratings using the dangerous tool of hysteria. Just imagine what the families of these former offenders are going through now. Can you say : starving kids?

Please contact this ruthless “news” station and voice your disapproval :

KCBD - TV NewsChannel 11
5600 Ave. A  Lubbock, TX 79404

Main: 806.744.1414
Fax: (806)744-0449

E-mail : 11listens@kcbd.com

It’s hard to imagine you can be punished for obeying the law, but Lubbock has just proven that you indeed can.

   I have just launched a new online radio program titled “Truthseeker Radio” on the TalkShoe network. This show will focus on sex offender human rights and the impact of public hysteria. It will be rather hard-hitting at times, so the program is intended for adult listeners only. I currently broadcast the first Saturday night of each month at 6:00 (Pacific Time) and you may either listen or call in then. There are also podcasts available for listening anytime.

You may listen and participate by clicking here.

In the near future, I plan to have guests on who advocate for SO human rights. If you’d like to be a guest on Truthseeker Radio, send me an e-mail . We can either do a live call in interview or a pre-recorded interview.

Hope you’ll join us every month and help make a difference by sharing what affect broad-reaching sex offender laws have on you and your family. Also, you may call the 24-hour Hotline at 1-760-203-0820 and leave your account there for inclusion in the “SOR Voices” podcast. Keep it tasteful, please. If you are a “troll” and leave a message that is harassing or in any way illegal, you will be reported. Otherwise, leave only information you are at liberty to share with listeners.

See you then, and here’s to getting the truth out.