The Truthseeker Blog

 

It has come to my attention that YouTube members like AZUStitches77 and AntiPaedo have been trying to defame our cause by posting fraudulent statements in their videos/blogs about former sex offenders.

I have challenged AZUStitches77’s claim that all sex offenders are rapists or one day will be rapists by asking her to provide factual data to support these absurd statements. To date, AZUStitches77 has not provided any factual data. Why? Because she is a fraud bent on destroying lives. Here are some of the myths people like AZUStitches77 are spreading around and what the truth is :

1. Most sex offenders are molesters or rapists and often re-offend. TRUTH : Most former sex offenders have NOT raped or molested anyone and a number are teenagers who had consensual sex with other teenagers. According to the Department Of Justice , less than 8% of sex offenders re-offend and most sexual abuse is committed by someone who is not on a registry which debunks the myth of “stranger danger” in the majority of cases.
2. Children are not on sex offender registries because it is illegal to place them there. TRUTH : There are indeed children as young as 10 (possibly younger) on some registries like the one in Texas. The rules change when it comes to sexual offenses. Many of these children have committed non-violent crimes such as playing doctor.
3.  You can’t be placed on a registry for urinating in public. TRUTH : Oh yes you can. There are a number of people on sex offender registries for “indecent exposure” crimes like urinating in public.
4. Anyone who views dirty pictures on the Net will go on to molest somebody. TRUTH : Nope. There are a variety of reasons why a person would view images deemed as child porn. It may simply be out of research as in the case of Pete Townshend (”The Who”) or to help authorities find the people who produce such materials. Factually, most who only view these images do not go on to hurt anyone. Plus, did you know Mark Lunsford downloaded images to his home computer? See post below.
5. Vigilantes fight for the children! TRUTH : Most vigilantes are cultists who see nothing wrong with violently attacking not only former sex offenders, but also their children. Plus, they care nothing about the teenagers and children included on sex offender registries who committed non-violent crimes simply because they believe all sex offenders are “monsters”. Fighting for the children? I think not.

Here is one of AZUStitches77’s fraudulent videos that claim Z-man (an activist) “incites sex offenders to blow up buildings” -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsB3GICbnsE

Please watch this video and rate it one star while posting critical comments on it’s defaming nature.

Also, check out my own video response here. ←

My video response is also available on YouTube . ←

---

 My textual response to AZU’s smear campaign against me on their Google blog :

  Oh wow, I must have struck a nerve because Absolute Zero United found it necessary to post a photo and semi-accurate data about me (they are even giving out the address of where my parents live, nice). It just proves even more how dangerous this cult is by using my photo to invite a violent attack against me and my family. What a smear campaign! I’ll just give AZU fair warning to remove this defaming post right away because neglecting to do so will be quite a mistake with Google and law enforcement. Once again, your demented cult has broken the law.

Check out Nevada Law regarding cyber stalking/harassment :

NRS 200.575 § 3 Stalking: Definitions and Penalties
A person who commits the crime of stalking with the use of an Internet or network site or electronic mail or any other similar means of communication to publish, display or distribute information in a manner that substantially increases the risk of harm or violence to the victim shall be punished for a category C felony as provided in NRS 193.130

NOTE : Jan Kruska is currently suing AZU and WIKIsposure for defamation of character among other serious charges. The threats she and her children have receieved from AZU is a huge injustice. We support Jan all the way!

So AZU denies there are teenagers on registries for having consensual sex with other teenagers. Well just have a look at RickysLife sometime or read about Jean Ponzanelli who is serving time for consensual teen sex. Not to mention Petra Luna (Barbara Ochoa) admitted this fact, saying that registering teenagers for such activity is a “necessary evil “. There are many “Romeo” teens on sex offender registries and it’s unjust. AZU also claims there is no difference between a person who views a handful of dirty pictures online and a person who violently rapes a child. Hmmm, well that would mean they should feel the same way about Mark Lunsford who viewed such images on his home PC (see post below). Yet, I have never heard them call Mark a “pedophile” or even say he should be punished for this activity. Hmm, I guess AZU believes high-profile people should not serve any time for sexual offenses. That’s interesting.

Again, consider who the real dangerous people in society are. After seeing how they are trying to make my digital photo into an online target board and how they promote violence against teenagers like Ricky, you can decide for yourself who the real creeps are in the world.

---

I ask that you know the truth before you buy in to these ludicrous claims by AZUStitches77 and other rabble-rousing cultists. Education is the key to safety, not hysteria. When you see any videos posted by these people, consider how many families are impacted by their hate-mongering, especially the children which they claim to protect. Also, ask them to provide factual data to back up their claims. I’m sure these warped individuals will come up empty-handed.

Trackback URI |